Transcendence need not imply going beyond the world. In relational monism, transcendence is immanent: it occurs within relation, in the trembling of the field, in the fissure of discontinuity that reveals the other person as the site of transcendence. Dialogicality thus becomes a form of transcendence that does not leave the world behind, but deepens […]

Dialogicality is one of the deepest phenomena of human existence. In relational monism, it is not an addition to ontology but its natural development: if every form is a relation, and every relation is susceptible to trembling, then dialogicality is the way in which the field becomes meaningful within human experience. Meaning is not a […]

Dialogics is one of the most profound ways of understanding relation. It does not describe relation as an ontological structure, but as a mode of human being in the world. Within relational monism, dialogics becomes a natural development of the ontology of rupture: if every form is a relation, and every relation is susceptible to […]