Relational Monism

  • Internet
  • All Articles
  • Castellano
  • English
  • Français
  • Italiano
  • Polski
  • Home
  • Why Silas?
  • Articles
  • Relational Monism
    • Ontology of Rupture
    • Relational Field
    • Relational Ontology
    • Relational Metaphysics
    • Relational Monism – General Approach
      • Relational Monism — Philosophers’ Bibliography
      • Monisme relationnel — bibliographie des philosophes
      • Monismo relazionale — bibliografia dei filosofi
      • Monizm relacyjny — bibliografia filozofów
  • Ethics
    • Ethical Freedom
    • Ethics of Encounter as the Sole Philosophy of an Immanent God
  • FAQ – Relational Monism
  • Trivia

Non‑Dual Differentiation in Relational Monism

July 28, 2026 by Silas O'Creamy Leave a Comment

Relational Monism

Non‑dual differentiation is a central structural principle of relational monism. It addresses a classical metaphysical problem: how a unified field can produce multiplicity without compromising its unity. Traditional ontologies often resolve differentiation through substance dualism, categorical partitioning, or hierarchical segmentation. Relational monism rejects these approaches, proposing instead that difference emerges as modulation within a single […]

Filed Under: English

Non‑Dual Gradients of Relational Intensity

July 28, 2026 by Silas O'Creamy Leave a Comment

Relational Monism

The concept of non‑dual gradients of relational intensity arises from the foundational claim of relational monism: reality consists not of discrete substances but of relations whose intensities vary across a continuous field. This framework rejects categorical distinctions between being and non‑being, substance and void, or presence and absence. Instead, it posits a single ontological continuum […]

Filed Under: English

The Epsilon Field in Relational Monism

July 28, 2026 by Silas O'Creamy Leave a Comment

Relational Monism

The epsilon field constitutes one of the most delicate and conceptually demanding elements of relational monism. It refers to the minimal relational intensity that prevents the monistic field from collapsing into metaphysical nullity. In this framework, ε is not a mathematical abstraction but an ontological limit condition: the smallest possible positive value of relational presence. […]

Filed Under: English

Epsilon Ontology

July 28, 2026 by Silas O'Creamy Leave a Comment

Relational Monism

Epsilon Ontology: Minimal Relational Presence as the Foundation of Being The concept of ε (epsilon) is traditionally employed in mathematics to denote an arbitrarily small positive quantity. In relational monism, ε acquires an ontological significance: it represents the minimal relational presence that prevents the field from collapsing into nothingness. This ε‑state is not a theoretical […]

Filed Under: English

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 25
  • Next Page »
These pages are created with significant support from AI Copilot (Microsoft)

ABOUT

Silas O’Creamy *, being entirely fictional, wishes to reassure the reader that any resemblance to actual philosophers, academics, metaphysicians, or self‑appointed epistemic authorities is purely coincidental — though, given the state of contemporary metaphysics, probably inevitable. This site is offered in the long and noble tradition of intellectual mischief: a reminder that the universe remains stubbornly unknowable, that our models are charmingly inaccurate, and that every theory — including Relational Monism — is merely the latest attempt to make ignorance look respectable.

Silas O'Creamy

Philosophy – English Philosophy Websites

  • Aeon
  • Daily Nous
  • Philosophy Now
  • APA Blog
  • Daily Philosophy
  • Open Philosophy Blog
  • Practical Ethics (Oxford)
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Silas O'Creamy Webmaster: 2026@atranspl.com

Silas O’Creamy is a fictional philosopher hosted by a very real translator who enjoys making metaphysics laugh at itself. Any resemblance to actual ontologists, living or dead, is purely coincidental — though probably inevitable.

The author, a very real translator with an affection for philosophical absurdity, hereby reserves the right to publish, republish, misplace, annotate, exaggerate, or otherwise enjoy this text in any medium he pleases. Silas, being a gentleman of leisure, approves wholeheartedly.

  • Contact
  • Cookies
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2026 · Agency Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in