Ethicality in relational monism is not an external addition to relations but the manner in which the field modulates its own tensions. It does not arise from principles but from response. It is not normative but dynamic. Its source is not stability but discontinuity, the very discontinuity that constitutes a relation as a structure vulnerable […]

Ethicality in relational monism does not arise from principles but from tension. It is not a collection of norms but a mode of presence within a field that is in constant vibration. Relation, as a structure vulnerable to rupture, creates conditions in which ethicality cannot remain abstract. It must be phenomenological, for it reveals itself […]

Yes, the formulation is accurate. Within the perspective of relational monism, ethics does not concern relation as an ontological structure, but rather the manner in which relation is experienced. Ontology describes the conditions of the existence of relation; ethics describes its phenomenology. It is precisely the phenomenological aspects of relation, the ways in which tensions, […]

Will precedes choice. It is not its consequence but its condition. In relational ontology, will constitutes the primordial tension of the field, the minimal propulsion that sustains a form along its trajectory. Choice appears only later, as one of the possible ways in which that tension may be actualised. Therefore, it is not will that […]